lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process_times
    From
    Date

    On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 12:20 +0000, Russell King wrote:
    > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > > move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock.
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
    >
    > Peter,
    >
    > Mind if I merge:
    >
    > > arch/arm/common/time-acorn.c | 2 --
    > > arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c | 3 ---
    > > arch/arm/plat-iop/time.c | 4 ----
    > > arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c | 2 --
    >
    > with my patch and submit it as part of the ARM merge (which I'm hoping
    > to send in about an hours time.)

    not at all, please do :-)



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-28 13:33    [W:0.021 / U:0.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site