lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: tickless/dynticks + cpufreq = tsc unstable
On Jan 25, 2008 6:02 PM, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> Is it normal that once I enable cpufreq on
> a tickless system, it spews a warning:
>
> Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -288201154 ns)
>
> ?

Yes, it's normal. Dual core AMD64 machines really do have unstable TSC.

Lee


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-26 00:33    [W:0.167 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site