Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults | Date | Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:11:19 +0100 |
| |
On Thursday 24 January 2008 08:02:11 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes: > >> /* > >> + * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry. This allows > > > > vmalloc_fault already has nearly the same logic. You should look > > at sharing the code. > > Hm, I see what you mean, but its hard to see how to share much code > there. It's a case of "two lines common, one line different" repeated 4 > times or so.
The core common logic is checking if the fault agrees with the page tables. If not do different things.
-Andi
| |