Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:46:05 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation |
| |
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:33:29PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> I have no obvious objection on either of these two proposals. > But one thing to mention is that > both of these two patches is written on the assumption that the > brightness levels listed in _BCL method are in ascending order, while > this is not stated in the ACPI spec. > Is this a problem?
The driver already makes that assumption, and it's implicit in the spec.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |