lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: CONFIG_MARKERS
    From
    Date

    Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> writes:

    > I notice in module.c:
    >
    > #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS
    > if (!mod->taints)
    > marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers,
    > mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL);
    > #endif
    >
    > Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...]

    I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect. If this is the
    intent, it seems misguided to me. There may instead be a relationship
    to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}. Mathieu?

    - FChE


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-23 04:05    [W:0.026 / U:29.856 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site