lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: CONFIG_MARKERS
From
Date

Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> writes:

> I notice in module.c:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS
> if (!mod->taints)
> marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers,
> mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL);
> #endif
>
> Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...]

I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect. If this is the
intent, it seems misguided to me. There may instead be a relationship
to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}. Mathieu?
- FChE


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-23 04:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans