[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] X86: fix typo PAT to X86_PAT

    * Dave Jones <> wrote:

    > > you mean modifies MTRRs? Which code is that? (besides the
    > > /proc/mtrr userspace API)
    > This exclusion is going to be a real pain in the ass for distro
    > kernels. It's impossible for example to build a kernel that will now
    > support the MTRR-alike registers on the AMD K6/early Cyrix etc and
    > also support PAT.
    > Additionally, given people tend to update their kernels a lot more
    > often than they update to a whole new version of X, it means until
    > userspace has caught up, we can't ship a kernel with PAT supported, or
    > else X gets a lot slower due to the missing mtrr support.

    there's no exclusion enforced right now, and if a CPU is PAT-incapable
    (or if the kernel is booted nopat) then the MTRR bits should be usable.
    But if we boot with PAT enabled, and Xorg gets /proc/mtrr wrong, we'll
    see nasty crashes. If it gets them right, it should all still work just
    fine. Is this ok? Then, in a year or two, distros can disable write
    support to /proc/mtrr. Hm?


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-18 22:05    [W:0.023 / U:0.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site