Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:39:43 +0100 | From | Jakob Oestergaard <> | Subject | Re: Why is the kfree() argument const? |
| |
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:47:01PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: ... > "restrict" exists for this reason. const is only about lvalue.
You think that I try to put more meaning into const than I do - but I don't.
Please read what I wrote, not what you want to think I wrote.
I agree that if I said what you seem to imply I said, then I would have been wrong. But I didn't so I'm not ;)
--
/ jakob
| |