Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:32:25 +0100 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.16.58 |
| |
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > do you insist on hearing the truth ("Sorry, I forgot to push."), or can > > > I tell you "I just wanted to see whether anyone notices." instead? ;-) > > > > :-) > > > > I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days > > ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months > > ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD > > pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was > > also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there > > unnoticed for 3 months ! > > According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20 > branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible...
Maybe he did this locally (Linus showed me that local FS cloning disables a lot of tests). Or maybe it could work for some pulls :-/ Definitely a weird issue anyway!
Cheers, Willy
| |