Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:22:13 +0900 | From | Kentaro Takeda <> | Subject | Re: [TOMOYO #6 retry 02/21] Add struct vfsmount to struct task_struct. |
| |
Hello.
Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > I must say I personally prefer the apparmor approach. No problem.
> But I'd recommend > you get together and get this piece pushed on its own, whichever version > you can agree on. TOMOYO can use AppArmor's patch.
> Yes it needs a user, but at this point I would think > both tomoyo and apparmor have had enough visibility that everyone knows > the intended users. Not only AppArmor and TOMOYO but also SELinux want to use "vfsmount". (http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=120005904211942&w=2)
> It seems to me you're both being held up by this piece, and getting > another full posting of either tomoyo or apparmor isn't going to help, > so hopefully you can combine your efforts to get this solved. We welcome AppArmor's vfsmount patches, but I wonder why AppArmor's vfsmount patches are not merged yet.
What prevents AppArmor's vfsmount patches from merging into -mm tree?
Regards. Kentaro Takeda
| |