lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] driver-core : add class iteration api
On Jan 14, 2008 8:13 PM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:47:54 +0800,
> Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Minor style suggestion (same for class_find_child):
>
> > +struct device *class_find_device(struct class *class, void *data,
> > + int (*match)(struct device *, void *))
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + int error = 1;
>
> How about using inverse logic here (e.g., start with int found = 0)...

Sounds good, will do. Thanks.

>
> > +
> > + if (!class)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + down(&class->sem);
> > + list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->devices, node) {
> > + dev = get_device(dev);
> > + if (dev) {
> > + if (match(dev, data)) {
> > + error = 0;
>
> ...and set found = 1 here...
>
> > + break;
> > + } else
> > + put_device(dev);
> > + } else
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + up(&class->sem);
> > +
> > + if (error)
> > + return NULL;
> > + return dev;
>
> ...and do
> return found ? dev : NULL;
> in the end?
>
> Especially since not finding the device is not really an error.
>
> > +}
>
> Otherwise this looks fine to me.
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-15 01:19    [W:0.094 / U:3.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site