[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
    On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:02:54 +0100
    Denys Vlasenko <> wrote:

    > Why is all this fixation on "volatile"? I don't think
    > people want "volatile" keyword per se, they want atomic_read(&x) to
    > _always_ compile into an memory-accessing instruction, not register
    > access.

    and ... why is that?
    is there any valid, non-buggy code sequence that makes that a
    reasonable requirement?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-09 20:25    [W:0.019 / U:17.700 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site