Messages in this thread | | | From | Al Boldi <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes | Date | Mon, 3 Sep 2007 21:26:47 +0300 |
| |
Erez Zadok wrote: > Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9}, > all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we > test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes > over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)
I am impressed, thanks!
It's probably a good idea to always point these backports out, whenever submitting patches against -mm. Otherwise, people might forget.
> So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel. > But, are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable > kernel), or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?
I'm talking about Unionfs, which seems like a rather critical feature to miss-out on. BTW, did you ever get that oops-on-umount worked out?
Thanks!
-- Al
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |