[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK

On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 10:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Ah, right, that was the detail... all this lumpy reclaim is useless for
> atomic allocations. And with SLUB using higher order pages, atomic !0
> order allocations will be very very common.
> One I can remember was:
> add_to_page_cache()
> radix_tree_insert()
> radix_tree_node_alloc()
> kmem_cache_alloc()
> which is an atomic callsite.
> Which leaves us in a situation where we can load pages, because there is
> free memory, but can't manage to allocate memory to track them..

Ah, I found a boot log of one of these sessions, its also full of
order-2 OOMs.. :-/

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-29 11:01    [W:0.105 / U:7.892 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site