Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:50:46 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] page->mapping clarification [1/3] base functions |
| |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:31:02 +0100 (BST) Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote: > Would that waste a little memory? I think not with SLUB, > but perhaps with SLOB, which packs a little tighter. >
maybe just depends on the amount of used anon_vma and page_mapping_info etc... I don't think a system which uses SLOB consumes such structs so much as that memory-for-alignment is considered as "waste" of memory.
Anyway, I decided to go ahead with current container-info-per-page implementation. If the size of page struct is problem at mainline inclusion discussion, I'll be back.
Thanks, -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |