Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:34:53 +0200 | From | Miloslav Semler <> | Subject | Re: Chroot bug |
| |
Alan Cox napsal(a): >> but many program use this as security feature. So do you think that bind >> may use vserver? >> > > It would be a lot stronger if it did. A bind running non-root will be > probably safe. A bind running as root can be attacked and break out of a > chroot trivially. I guess it depends how you run bind. > but not bind with selinux. It can chroot, but not does other things. So there is an question: Why we do not fix it. Tell me please some other reason than "you can workaround chroot other ways".
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |