Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:30:17 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KERNEL__ |
| |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > This brings x86_64 into line with all other architectures by only defining > cond_syscall() when __KERNEL__ is defined. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
> Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h > +++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h > @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
This is the previous __KERNEL__ block.
> #endif /* __NO_STUBS */
And this one shouldn't extent iver the declarations of sys_iopl and sys_rt_sigactions I think. If it should be there at all.
So please make this file at least semi-clean while you're at it instead of much worse.
The __KERNEL__ block should also be extended over the various __ARCH_WANT_ definitions because they're not for userspace at all.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |