lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
Date
On Sep 20, 2007, at 19:18:41, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 20 September 2007 4:26:13 pm Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> But the problem remains that there are printk's which don't have a
>> KERN_* as the first argument. Those are also impossible to get rid
>> off in this way, as the loglevel is unknown (and you don't want
>> partially printed messages).
>>
>> So adding the comma is really needed and in addition all printk's
>> without a loglevel should get one. Which clutters the code and may
>> increase codesize.
>
> It's ok to _explicitly_ not have a loglevel, and thus take a known
> default. The problem is printing out less than a full line,
> continuing it later, and not making obvious at compile time what
> the level of this chunk is.

That's actually a fairly straightforward problem to solve. Really we
ought to be able to guarantee that lines from different CPUs are not
intermixed. This can end up in a log like this:

info: Current device state: <1>netdev watchdog timeout: eth0
reg1=0xABCD reg2=0xDEADBEEF

Clearly unpleasant, no? Really any logging which wants to print out
a bunch of stuff with multiple printk()s should use an API something
like this:

Option 1: Buffer allocated with kmalloc(). Sleep-ish context, can
handle failures easily
> struct printk_queue qpk;
> if (qprintk_kmalloc(&qpk, level, GFP_KERNEL))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> qprintk(&qpk, "Some string here:");
> qprintk(&qpk, " %d, %s, %d", 4, some_string, 42);
> qprintk_finish(&qpk);


Option 2: Preallocated per-cpu buffer. preempt_disable()d
> struct printk_queue qpk;
> qprintk_percpu(&qpk, level);
> [...]
> qprintk_finish(&qpk);


Option 3: Preallocated per-cpu interrupts-only buffer. Only from
code which may interrupt a preempt_disable() section
> struct printk_queue qpk;
> qprintk_irq(&pqk, level)
> [...]
> qprintk_finish(&qpk);


For all of the above, the final "qprintk_finish()" call would
essentially take the printk spinlock and write the contents of the
qpk->buffer into the dmesg ringbuffer, inserting ("<%d>", level) at
the beginning and after each newline. The buffers would all be some
useful fixed size (a page?); if you need more than that then you are
probably trying to queue too much and excess data would be truncated.

Since the level would be a constant passed to qprintk_
{kmalloc,percpu,irq} in almost every case, you could easily do
something like this:
static inline int qprintk_kmalloc(struct printk_queue *qpk,
unsigned int level, gfp_t gfp)
{
if (level > CONFIG_MAX_LOG_LEVEL) {
qpk->type = QPRINTK_TYPE_NONE; /* also 0 */
qpk->buffer = NULL;
return 0;
}
_qprintk_kmalloc(qpk, level, gfp);
}
#define qprintk(QPK, FMT...) do { \
if ((QPK)->type)
_qprintk(QPK, FMT);
} while(0)

With a bit more glue that would cause GCC to notice that for a given
qprintk_kmalloc the "qpk->type" is always zero because the level is
too high, and therefore it would optimize out *ALL* of the
_qprintk_kmalloc(), _qprintk(), and _qprintk_finish() calls.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-21 23:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans