Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:51:12 +0100 (BST) | From | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
| |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> You always put boring, crappy, insufficient text in the for-the-changelog > section and interesting, useful, sufficient text in the not-for-the-changelog > section.
I'll swap the sections in the future then. ;-) Frankly I was not sure whether the changelog was happy about being fed with lengthy explanations and it has not spoken out.
I have to admit this is a habit carried over from the FSF-style ChangeLog -- where the enforced rule is actually *not* to provide any explanation for why changes are done and only describe what has been modified (with any discussion around archived in the respective mailing list).
> But you can't fool me! I have an editor and I fix it up.
Thank you and sorry for the extra work I caused you -- I shall keep your suggestion in mind in the future.
Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |