Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Sep 2007 21:21:52 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE/RFC] Really Fair Scheduler |
| |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > > so unmodified CFS is 4.6% faster on this box than with Roman's > > > > patch and it's also more consistent/stable (10 times lower > > > > fluctuations). > > > > > > Was SCHED_DEBUG enabled or disabled for these runs? > > > > debugging disabled of course. (your patch has a self-validity > > checking function [verify_queue()] that is called on SCHED_DEBUG=y, > > it would have been unfair to test your patch with that included.) > > I'll look into it next week.
thanks. FYI, there's plenty of time - i'll be at the KS next week so i'll be quite unresponsive to emails. Would be nice if you could take a quick look at the trivial patch i posted today though. How close is it to your algorithm, have i missed any important details? (not counting nice levels and rounding, it's just a quick & dirty prototype to show the first layer of the core math and nothing more.)
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |