Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:51:08 -0400 | From | Phillip Susi <> | Subject | Re: iso9660 vs udf |
| |
Andries E. Brouwer wrote: > Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not > mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option. > That is, > # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660 > works fine, but > # mount /dev/hdc /dir > mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc > I will try type udf > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc, > missing codepage or other error > In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try > dmesg | tail or so > # dmesg | tail > UDF-fs INFO UDF 0.9.8.1 (2004/29/09) Mounting volume 'Wisk1956-82', timestamp 2006/03/07 16:26 (1078) > udf: udf_read_inode(ino 547) failed !bh > UDF-fs: Error in udf_iget, block=1, partition=1
What does the line for hdc show in /etc/fstab? Mount tries whichever filesystem(s) is/are listed there if you omit -t. My guess is that it only lists udf and this is a cd so it contains iso9660, not udf.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |