lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: iso9660 vs udf
Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
> mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
> That is,
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
> works fine, but
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir
> mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
> I will try type udf
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc,
> missing codepage or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
> # dmesg | tail
> UDF-fs INFO UDF 0.9.8.1 (2004/29/09) Mounting volume 'Wisk1956-82', timestamp 2006/03/07 16:26 (1078)
> udf: udf_read_inode(ino 547) failed !bh
> UDF-fs: Error in udf_iget, block=1, partition=1

What does the line for hdc show in /etc/fstab? Mount tries whichever
filesystem(s) is/are listed there if you omit -t. My guess is that it
only lists udf and this is a cd so it contains iso9660, not udf.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-19 23:53    [W:1.977 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site