[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX
    On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
    > Hash: SHA1
    > Andi Kleen wrote:
    > >> But the spec calls for a "null address" to be used and that's in my
    > >> understanding something different from using AF_UNSPEC.
    > >
    > > memset(&sockaddr, 0, sizeof(sockaddr)) should give you AF_UNSPEC
    > But the spec calls for <quote>null address for the protocol</quote>.
    > That means the family for the null address is the same as the family of
    > the socket.

    Spec doesn't match traditional behaviour then. IPv4 is
    traditionally an synonym for old style all broadcast (
    on UDP/RAW and it's certainly possible to connect() to that.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-19 19:59    [W:0.018 / U:19.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site