[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Allowing different registers should be doable, but if so, one would have
> to put 0: at the *end* of the instruction and use (0f)-4 instead, since
> the non-%eax forms are one byte longer.

OK, that's already a problem since its using "=r" as the constraint.

> This also seems "safer", since an imm32 is always the last thing in the
> instruction.

Good idea. If gas/gcc generates entirely the wrong addressing mode,
then we've got bigger problems.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-19 00:31    [W:0.105 / U:5.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site