Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:30:25 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images |
| |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:21:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:05:51 -0700 > > > The bnx2 firmware changes quite frequently. A new driver quite often > > requires new firmware to work correctly. Splitting them up makes things > > difficult for the user. > > > > The firmware in tg3 is a lot more mature and I don't expect it to > > change. I think tg3 is better suited for using request_firmware(). > > Like I said, I think neither should change and the driver should > be fully functional when built statically into the kernel.
Michael, doesn't a functional-yet-suboptimal firmware exist ? I mean, just the same principle as we all have kernels, boot CDs, statically built tools, etc... which run everywhere. If you have such a beast, maybe it would be a good start to have it in the kernel, and provide the users with the ability to upgrade the firmware once the system is able to do more complex things.
Just a thought...
Regards, Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |