Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:08:23 -0500 | From | Anthony Liguori <> | Subject | Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure |
| |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Yeah, see, the initial goal was to make it possible to use the KVM >> paravirtualizations on other hypervisors. However, I don't think this >> is really going to be possible in general so maybe it's better to just >> use leaf 0. I'll let others chime in before sending a new patch. >> > > Hm. Obviously you can just define a signature for "kvm-compatible > hypercall interface" and make it common that way, but it gets tricky if > the hypervisor supports multiple hypercall interfaces, including the kvm > one. Start the kvm leaves at 0x40001000 or something? >
Yeah, that works with me.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> J > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |