Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:14:43 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure |
| |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:38:10AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > By definition any container (about to be renamed control group) > subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit > redundant. > > Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched"
Done (in the latest patch I sent a while back)!
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |