lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!
    On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

    >
    > On Aug 31 2007 18:02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Robert P. J. Day wrote:
    > >> it may be that some people had a different understanding of what was
    > >> meant by "maturity" than i did. what *i* meant by that attribute is
    > >> a feature's current position in the normal software life cycle, and
    > >> that would be one of:
    > >>
    > >> experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete
    > >
    > > People who actually write and maintain code disagree with your imaginative
    > > interpretation.
    >
    > Might I point to the "designers and builders" thread...
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/279 :)

    i'm trying to figure out whether i fall into the "insane" or the
    "hmmm, interesting, we'll get back to you" camp. :-)

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZF3r5lAvhYI

    rday
    --
    ========================================================================
    Robert P. J. Day
    Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
    Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

    http://crashcourse.ca
    ========================================================================
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-01 11:21    [W:0.028 / U:32.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site