Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:35:08 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my! |
| |
On Aug 31 2007 18:02, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> it may be that some people had a different understanding of what was >> meant by "maturity" than i did. what *i* meant by that attribute is >> a feature's current position in the normal software life cycle, and >> that would be one of: >> >> experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete > > People who actually write and maintain code disagree with your imaginative > interpretation.
Might I point to the "designers and builders" thread... http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/279 :)
Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |