Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:50:28 -0600 | From | "Chris Friesen" <> | Subject | Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are? |
| |
Chris Snook wrote:
> This is not a problem, since indirect references will cause the CPU to > fetch the data from memory/cache anyway.
Isn't Zan's sample code (that shows the problem) already using indirect references?
Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |