[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:41:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 02:26:53AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > I always thought the right solution would be to just sync atime only
    > > very very lazily. This means if a inode is only dirty because of an
    > > atime update put it on a "only write out when there is nothing to do
    > > or the memory is really needed" list.
    > Which is the policy I implemented for XFS a while ago.

    How would that work? I didn't think XFS had separate inode lists.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-06 12:45    [W:0.017 / U:13.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site