Messages in this thread | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix pci device initialization fail after kexec (2.6.23-rc2). (Related to e1000 doesn't resume properly from standby) | Date | Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:54:35 -0700 |
| |
On Monday 06 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Section 5.4.1 of PCI PM 1.1. spec is about D3_hot. Specifically, it says > that if a device in D3_hot is programmed to D0, it performs the equivalent of > a warm reset. IOW, this is supposed to happen if the current state is D3_hot > and the targed state is D0, which is covered by the code snippet above.
Actually, it's *allowed* to do a warm reset. Not required. And not all PCI devices will do such a reset. Some of them will return to D0_initialized ... not D0_uninitialized (where uninitialized means "did the reset").
It's D3_cold where a (powerup) reset is *required*.
A common example would be a USB host controller. If one of those did a warm reset it'd trash all the connection state which was carefully retained during sleep ... and there'd be no point to supporting D3_hot rather than D3_cold.
As a rule of thumb, it's probably safe to assume that if a device can generate wakeup events, it probably doesn't trash all of its state when it resumes from D3_hot.
Of course, if it can generate wakeup events from D3_cold, the difference between Vaux and Vcc power wells comes into play. The Vaux powered bits will retain state, while the stuff powered by Vcc gets a powerup reset.
If it can't generate wakeup events, a PCI device has no particular need to retain state after D3. Implementors can choose whichever is most convenient.
- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |