Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:01:16 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: Kernel Bug in 2.4.35 when compiled gcc>=4.2.0 and -march=c3 |
| |
Willy Tarreau wrote: > > I'm well aware of that, even in the example I wrote to reproduce the issue > and posted to gcc's bugzilla, I clearly have one function prototype and a > separate asm statement which contained a label with the function's name. > > So in my opinion, the code above is not buggy. It's dirty (though I did > not find how to produce the equivalent in a different manner). >
Well, top-level assembly is usually nasty. Setting the section in the assembly statement as you said is probably the only thing you *can* do.
I don't think there is any requirement that top-level assembly statements get the section set to .text on their behalf.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |