[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

* Diego Calleja <> wrote:

> > Measurements show that noatime helps 20-30% on regular desktop
> > workloads, easily 50% for kernel builds and much more than that (in
> > excess of 100%) for file-read-intense workloads. We cannot just walk
> And as everybody knows in servers is a popular practice to disable it.
> According to an interview to the admins....

yeah - but i'd be surprised if more than 1% of all Linux servers out
there had noatime.

> "Beyond that, Peter noted, "very little fancy is going on, and that is
> good because fancy is hard to maintain." He explained that the only
> fancy thing being done is that all filesystems are mounted noatime
> meaning that the system doesn't have to make writes to the filesystem
> for files which are simply being read, "that cut the load average in
> half."

nice quote :-)

> I bet that some people would consider such performance hit a bug...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-06 09:01    [W:0.215 / U:0.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site