Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:36:45 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated) |
| |
On Mon 2007-08-06 13:15:17, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Well, so that it does not bitrot? This is few bytes, I'd say, and I > > believe we have too many config options already. > > This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd > prefer
Ok, option that users can't set is probably not evil.
> having two new per-ARCH config symbols though: > config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > > and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.
Looks like a plan.
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |