lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
    On Mon 2007-08-06 13:15:17, Johannes Berg wrote:
    > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
    >
    > > Well, so that it does not bitrot? This is few bytes, I'd say, and I
    > > believe we have too many config options already.
    >
    > This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd
    > prefer

    Ok, option that users can't set is probably not evil.

    > having two new per-ARCH config symbols though:
    > config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
    > depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
    >
    > and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.

    Looks like a plan.

    Pavel
    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-06 13:39    [W:3.892 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site