Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated) | From | Johannes Berg <> | Date | Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:22:42 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > > and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.
In fact, just doing depends on (ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE && !SMP) || (ARCH_SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE && SMP)
would probably be good instead of doing the intermediate SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE and SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE. The reason I like this better is that we don't have a central editing point where patches conflict causing unnecessary problems. But both are much better than what we have now anyway :)
johannes [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |