[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: renaming kernel devices [was: VIA EPIA EK: strange eth dev numbering]
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:47:23PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> It does not rename ethX to the "next free" one, but to a _persistent_ one.
>> If it were a "next free" thing, then removing a card would shuffle all
>> your eth around again (and invalidate your iptables rules at the same
>> time, to note).
> It is questionable what is _persistent_ . MAC-based names are persistent
> with regard to adding and removing of other cards, 'Plain' names are persistent
> with regard to replacing that card with different item (of a same kind).
> I am very happy that (using 'plain' names) i can send technician to
> replace broken NIC in our routers without need for configuration
> change.

this is a very important point, and with the distros (and many kernel
people) treating udev as a requirement this is going to bite a lot of

David Lang
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-03 06:51    [W:0.121 / U:35.212 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site