[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove hugetlb_instantiation_mutex
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:15 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :)
> > Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is one show-stopper and I
> > have some reservations (pun definitely intended) with your approach:
> Thanks for your great comments.

Sorry for such a long delay in responding. I have been pretty busy

> > First, your patch does not pass the libhugetlbfs test
> > 'alloc-instantiate-race' which was written to tickle the the race which
> > the mutex was introduced to solve. Your patch works for shared
> > mappings, but not for the private case.
> My testing about private might not be thorough. Function hugetlb_cow has a race
> for multi-thread to fault on the same private page index. But after I fixed it,
> alloc-instantiate-race still failed.
> I tried to google the source code tarball of libhugetlbfs test suite, but couldn't
> find it. Would you like to send me a copy of the test source codes?

The tarball will contain a test called alloc-instantiate-race. Make
sure to run it in private and shared mode. Let me know what you find

Adam Litke - (agl at
IBM Linux Technology Center

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-03 18:42    [W:0.065 / U:8.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site