lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
    > Just to be clear, in the previous email I posted on this thread, I
    > described a worst-case network ping-pong test case (send a packet, wait
    > for reply), and found out that a deffered interrupt scheme just damaged
    > the performance of the test case. Since the folks who came up with the
    > test case were adamant, I turned off the defferred interrupts.
    > While defferred interrupts are an "obvious" solution, I decided that
    > they weren't a good solution. (And I have no other solution to offer).

    Sounds exactly like the default netperf TCP_RR test and any number of other
    benchmarks. The "send a request, wait for reply, send next request, etc etc
    etc" is a rather common application behaviour afterall.

    rick jones
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-24 19:11    [W:3.886 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site