Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:34:34 -0500 | From | "Josh Boyer" <> | Subject | Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections |
| |
On 8/23/07, Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:35:07PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > While I think that's laudable, we definitely don't have the resources > > > for that, as everyone on the TAB already has a full workload. And it > > > hardly seems worth the trouble for a once-a-year election. > > > > Exactly ... we want a process that's simple and transparent. We chose > > voting at the KS because almost all the attendees satisfy the "made > > significant contributions to Linux" requirement without us having to do > > anything or make any controversial determinations. Like Matt said, > > better suggestions are welcome. > > This is a dumb suggestion, but... > > How about one vote per git commit merged to linus' tree? > > Might be worthwhile to allocate votes for Acked-By and so on, as well.
Because git only goes back to 2.6.12.
josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |