lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
    On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:

    > On 22/08/07, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
    > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:
    > >
    > > > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter.
    > > > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should
    > > > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables
    > > > secmark rule.
    > >
    > > Michal, do you see this in current git?
    >
    > No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last
    > month, but it is fixed now.
    >
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362

    The previous problem is theoretically unrelated. It arose via a separate
    mechanism which can't be used at the same as the one you're seeing now in
    the logs.

    So this either looks like a problem which has gone unnoticed and was
    inadvertently fixed at some point, or is unique to the 2.6.20 stable
    series.


    - James
    --
    James Morris
    <jmorris@namei.org>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-22 18:37    [W:3.037 / U:0.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site