Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:29:40 +0200 | From | "Michal Piotrowski" <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review |
| |
On 22/08/07, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter. > > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should > > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables > > secmark rule. > > Michal, do you see this in current git?
No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last month, but it is fixed now.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362
Regards, Michal
-- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |