[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: LDD3 pitfalls (was Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures)
    Stefan Richter wrote:
    > Nick Piggin wrote:
    >> Stefan Richter wrote:
    >>> Nick Piggin wrote:
    >>>> I don't know why people would assume volatile of atomics. AFAIK, most
    >>>> of the documentation is pretty clear that all the atomic stuff can be
    >>>> reordered etc. except for those that modify and return a value.
    >>> Which documentation is there?
    >> Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
    >>> For driver authors, there is LDD3. It doesn't specifically cover
    >>> effects of optimization on accesses to atomic_t.
    >>> For architecture port authors, there is Documentation/atomic_ops.txt.
    >>> Driver authors also can learn something from that document, as it
    >>> indirectly documents the atomic_t and bitops APIs.
    >> "Semantics and Behavior of Atomic and Bitmask Operations" is
    >> pretty direct :)
    >> Sure, it says that it's for arch maintainers, but there is no
    >> reason why users can't make use of it.
    > Note, LDD3 page 238 says: "It is worth noting that most of the other
    > kernel primitives dealing with synchronization, such as spinlock and
    > atomic_t operations, also function as memory barriers."
    > I don't know about Linux 2.6.10 against which LDD3 was written, but
    > currently only _some_ atomic_t operations function as memory barriers.
    > Besides, judging from some posts in this thread, saying that atomic_t
    > operations dealt with synchronization may not be entirely precise.

    atomic_t is often used as the basis for implementing more sophisticated
    synchronization mechanisms, such as rwlocks. Whether or not they are designed
    for that purpose, the atomic_* operations are de facto synchronization primitives.

    -- Chris
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-20 15:31    [W:0.029 / U:0.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site