[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CFS review

    On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > So I think it would be entirely appropriate to
    > - do something that *approximates* microseconds.
    > Using microseconds instead of nanoseconds would likely allow us to do
    > 32-bit arithmetic in more areas, without any real overflow.

    The basic problem is that one needs a number of bits (at least 16) for
    normalization, which limits the time range one can work with. This means
    that 32 bit leaves only room for 1 millisecond resolution, the remainder
    could maybe saved and reused later.
    So AFAICT using micro- or nanosecond resolution doesn't make much
    computational difference.

    bye, Roman
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-03 01:25    [W:0.029 / U:1.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site