[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

* Lee Revell <> wrote:

> On 7/31/07, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> > Almost all of the Reiser3
> > code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel infrastructure
> > that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code.
> Also NFS:
> $ grep -rIi lock_kernel kernel-source/linux-2.6.17/fs/nfs/ | wc -l
> 94

yeah - but i never saw NFS cause really big BKL latencies. IIRC it uses
the BKL mostly for archaic reasons, most of the NFS code is SMP-safe.
Almost all of the reiser3 code runs under the BKL on the other hand.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-02 13:49    [W:0.269 / U:1.636 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site