lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS
    On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Joe Perches wrote:

    > On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
    > > $ show_subsystem drivers/bluetooth/bpa10x.c
    > > BLUETOOTH
    >
    > "what's a subsystem"? I'm not sure there is an appropriate
    > definition. If there is an appropriate definition, why should anyone
    > care what subsystem a particular file is in?

    i'm confused -- i thought that was sort of the whole purpose of this
    exercise, to match parts of the kernel source tree against the
    maintainer for those parts, and to do that via the defined
    "subsystem" which is currently used in MAINTAINERS.

    you can, of course, banish the concept of a subsystem entirely and
    work purely from a file and directory perspective, but i think the
    notion of the kernel tree being composed of subsystems is a useful
    idea. that's just my opinion, though.

    rday
    --
    ========================================================================
    Robert P. J. Day
    Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
    Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

    http://crashcourse.ca
    ========================================================================
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-19 14:57    [W:0.024 / U:89.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site