[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Christoph Lameter writes:

> No it does not have any volatile semantics. atomic_dec() can be reordered
> at will by the compiler within the current basic unit if you do not add a
> barrier.

Volatile doesn't mean it can't be reordered; volatile means the
accesses can't be eliminated.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-17 04:49    [W:0.234 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site