Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:50:41 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix getdelays.c example -l option and segv |
| |
<snip>
>> Is this really required? a sleep() in the code. Why do we do multiple >> send_cmd()'s in the do loop? I'll test and get back. > > I needed to send another command to receive more data. Without the per > loop send_cmd, I never got any more stats. > > Should we receive more data without the additional send_cmd? I've been > running with: > ./getdelays -d -p 1 -l >
Interesting, we never used -l that way. We used -l to get data for all exiting tasks
./getdelays -d -l
For the usage you've mentioned, I'd use
while : do sleep 2 ./getdelays -p 1 -d done
I guess your changes change getdelays and since there are other ways to obtaining the same data, I'd remove the last bit of changes made to send the TGID often to get data.
> Mikey > >
-- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |