Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:11:29 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
| |
I wrote: > static inline void A(atomic_t *a) > { > int b = atomic_read(a); > if (b) > do_something_time_consuming(); > } > > static inline void B(atomic_t *a) > { > int b = atomic_read(a); > if (b) > do_something_more(); > } > > static void C(atomic_t *a) > { > A(a); > B(b); /* ^ typo */ B(a); > } > > Would this need forget(a) after A(a)? > > (Is the latter actually answered in C99 or is it compiler-dependent?)
-- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =--- -==== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |