lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: splice question
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:41:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David H?rdeman wrote:
>> Otherwise I guess I'd have to add a second pipe, then (in a loop)
>> tee() from the first to the second pipe and then splice from the second pipe
>> to a socket. Doesn't sound very elegant and would need quite a lot of extra
>> syscalls.
>
>You really should think of this as a memcpy(), and you'll be in the right
>mindframe. The system calls themselves are cheap.

Ok, I've implemented it using two pipes, and it works. But it does seem
a bit wasteful...in case one client is not keeping up, the data will
have to be tee():ed first from pipe1 to pipe2, only to then find out
that the splice() from pipe2 to socket only does a partial transfer
after which the data in pipe2 has to be thrown away and then the loop
starts over with the next client.

A tee() from pipe1 to the socket could (I imagine) realize immediately
that the socket does not have enough buffer space and return EWOULDBLOCK
and avoid at least one copy?

--
David Härdeman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-12 22:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans