Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:56:25 +0200 | From | Andreas Radke <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.20.16 review 00/28] 2.6.20.16 -stable review |
| |
Am Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:00:15 +0200 schrieb Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>:
> My goal is *not* to do all the hard work they do, but just to backport > from their patches those which are meaningful for 2.6.20. For this > reason, 2.6.20 releases will always be slightly late and should not > contain patches not merged in more recent releases. > > My intent with this version is to catch up with 2.6.21.7. Other > patches are already pending for future releases, but one thing at a > time. I'm trying to follow the same review/release process, so 28 > patches will be posted for review in response to this message.
hm. i'm a bit confused about your intention.
will you keep maintaining 2.6.20.x for longer? should this one replace or live along the 2.6.16.xx long life series?
Andreas Radke ArchLinux x86_64 developer/maintainer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |