Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: resume from ram much slower | Date | Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:00:10 +0200 |
| |
On Friday, 10 August 2007 18:48, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > Hi, > > Starting 1-2 weeks ago I have very long resume from > ram times. It takes more than 1 min to resume. Does anyone see such behaviour? > > Kernel from yesterday git, thinkpad z60m, suspend.sf.net tools 20070801 > > "ACPI handle has no context!" are interesting btw.
Let's try to find out something.
Please apply the patch below and see if anything changes.
Greetings, Rafael
--- drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc2/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.23-rc2.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c @@ -130,11 +130,21 @@ static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(str #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP static int pnpacpi_suspend(struct pnp_dev *dev, pm_message_t state) { - return acpi_bus_set_power((acpi_handle) dev->data, - acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&dev->dev, - device_may_wakeup - (&dev->dev), - NULL)); + int power_state; + + power_state = acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&dev->dev, + device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev), + NULL); + + if (power_state < 0) { + printk(KERN_ERR + "%s: Could not choose power state for device!\n", + dev->name); + power_state = (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON) ? + ACPI_STATE_D0 : ACPI_STATE_D3; + } + + return acpi_bus_set_power((acpi_handle) dev->data, power_state); } static int pnpacpi_resume(struct pnp_dev *dev)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |